🔗 Share this article

Jennifer Lawrence has become part of the increasing number of performers who express doubts about the necessity of on-set intimacy professionals, revealing she chose not to use their services while working on her new movie her upcoming film.

Examining the Purpose of Intimacy Coordinators

On-set intimacy professionals emerged following the #MeToo movement to guarantee the safety and ease of actors during scenes involving partial undress and sexual content. Yet, several well-known actors including Jennifer Aniston and other established stars have expressed reservations about their involvement, with several suggesting they interfere with artistic process.

Jennifer's On-Set Perspective

Speaking during the popular culture podcast, while promoting her latest project where she plays a character descending into postpartum disturbance, the actress commented: "We did not have an intimacy coordinator, or perhaps we had the option but didn't make use of their services... I felt entirely secure with Rob."

She continued: "He is completely professional and deeply devoted to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations mostly focused on our children and personal connections. There was never uncomfortable moments or questions about personal boundaries."

"Had there been the slightest indication of unease, I would have requested an on-set professional. Many male actors get upset if you aren't interested in their attention, and subsequently the retaliation starts. He was completely different."

Industry Recognition and Ongoing Debate

Recently, industry platform IMDb formally acknowledged intimacy coordinators as a separate category, alongside eleven other professional roles including dance direction, catering, and puppet operation. Previously, they were categorized as "additional crew" instead of having their own designation.

Despite this recognition, intimacy coordinators still encounter public discussion implying they aren't necessarily industry essential, with high-profile performers rejecting their participation. Jennifer's viewpoint echoes that of Jennifer Aniston, who previously shared she refused intimacy coordination while filming alongside Jon Hamm on their television series.

Jennifer's Perspective

"He proved to be extremely respectful – I mean each action, between takes, 'You comfortable?'" she remembered. "It was also very choreographed. That's the advantage of working with talented directors, appropriate music. So, minimal preparation is needed."

She added, "They offered, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Honestly, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're experienced professionals – we can manage appropriately. And we had Mimi on set."

Additional Cases and Professional Response

Despite featuring multiple sequences of intimate moments and regular undress, the award-winning film – the director's Oscar-winning project about a sex worker and a wealthy heir – filmed without an intimacy coordinator.

The film's star stated she and co-star Mark Eydelshteyn "concluded it would be preferable to maintain privacy."

"My character is a sex worker, and I had researched Sean's films and recognized his dedication to realism. I was mentally prepared for it. As an actress, I approached it as part of my job."

These statements generated strong reactions from intimacy coordinators, mirroring the response to Gwyneth Paltrow's recent comments, who recently shared that working on her forthcoming project Marty Supreme marked her first encounter with the emerging role, which she "did not know existed."

Gwyneth's Viewpoint

During filming about comfort level with a specific move alongside co-star her younger counterpart, the actress answered: "I belong to the generation where you get naked, you assume position, the camera's on."

Paltrow added that she and Chalamet then informed the coordinator: "We believe we're comfortable. You can maintain distance.' I can't speak to how it is for emerging actors, but... if someone is instructing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, very stifled by that."

Professional Reaction

Following these comments, former Channel 4 drama head an experienced producer described them as "irresponsible" and highlighted that most of those speaking against these professionals have established careers to command their own power and protection on production locations.

"Periodically an actor makes comments about whether they value on-set professionals or not," commented the executive. "The actress stated she grew up in a period when people in Hollywood 'took our kit off and got on with it'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood performing alongside a actor much younger than her, although likely Chalamet is chill, I considered it quite an irresponsible statement."

Actor's Viewpoint

The veteran actor, in contrast, shared that he believes the primary responsibility during heterosexual sex scenes rests with the male actor, instead of a external professional.

"Based on my career, you take responsibility as the man to make certain the woman is at ease, you talk through completely," he explained. "You communicate, '{OK, I'm going to make contact there if that's agreeable'. It's extremely careful but appears like it's occurring organically, which is ideally what authentic performance appears as."